If you have trouble viewing this message, please click here.

ARXIS - Litigation Consulting
ABOUT ARXIS                          SERVICES                          CONTACT

April 2022

Recent Case:

Valuing 50% Ownership Interest


Summary of Issue:

Two people decided to start a business together. They were friends, entrepreneurs, and believed they would both contribute in different ways to the success of the business. One partner was the "rainmaker," and the other was the management/administrative genius. They both agreed that they should each have an equal say in the operations of the business and, since they saw eye-to-eye on everything, there would be little to no disagreement anyway. They visited an attorney and established the corporation reflecting a 50/50 ownership and decision-making structure. Both owners were content that they had equal control and ownership. They proceeded to buy an existing business and began operations that turned out to be wildly successful.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?!

In short, everything can go wrong in this scenario and, too often, it does. When nobody has "control" or the ability to break a tie, nobody has the necessary authority. Starting out, both parties feel like they have mutual and equal control but, in a dispute, neither party has the control to move past a disagreement. The vagaries of 50/50 ownership are usually exposed at one of two extremes: 1) The business becomes successful producing a lot of cash flow, or 2) the business struggles or even begins to fail. Either of these two extremes tend to produce disagreements that cannot be resolved in a 50/50 environment.

In this case, decisions regarding distributions of profits, preserving cash for working capital and growth, and expansion plans were frozen by the 50/50 tie. As is usually the case, one of the two partners decided to step into the control role and began making decisions that forced the other owner to either ignore, accept, or challenge those decisions. And, as in most similar cases, the decision to challenge was deferred as long as possible but eventually was unavoidable. Once decisions were challenged, the relationship between the parties disintegrated to such a degree that there were accusations of theft, embezzlement, diversion of business assets, and more. It was not long before there were active discussions and negotiations regarding a corporate divorce and the need for a business valuation. It is not unusual for attorneys to be involved at that point and, where there are attorneys, there is the likelihood of litigation.

What started out well (a new business), would not end as satisfactorily! Litigation was initiated to resolve the civil fraud claims and the business valuation/buyout issue. The court authorized a forensic fraud examination, producing a 100+ page report, and appointed a panel of valuation experts designed to resolve such disputes, in accordance with the law of the state. The ensuing drama went on for over two years at a cost estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Arxis work:

We were one of the three appointed valuation experts. Because of the length and complexity of the fraud examination report, the court requested the panel to make a determination regarding the existence of fraud, its impact on the value of the business, and to provide a buyout value.

A difficulty in achieving the court's request was whether the value could be determined if there was credible evidence of unreported (stolen) receipts and fraudulent (personal) expenses recorded in the financial statements of the business (i.e., the value would be impacted by such unreported fraud amounts).

Additionally, the valuation panel unanimously found the fraud report unreliable and completely speculative - in essence, unhelpful. Consequently, the panel conducted discovery and multiple interviews of the owners and management team. The panel discovered that the IRS and local government agencies had conducted comprehensive audits of the business corporate tax returns in the recent past and issued "no-change" audit letters. That seemed to be persuasive evidence that, at minimum, reported income and expenses were reasonably accurate. There was no better evidence produced one way or the other.


The business was valued based on the financial statements of the business. The court ruled that one of the shareholders could be bought out at the amount derived from the valuation panel's conclusion, or the business would be ordered sold or liquidated. It was an outcome that could not possibly have been anticipated when two friends decided to start a business together and "share" all the control of the business. It is likely that neither party was happy with the result. Neither shareholder could have felt that they had any control of their destiny throughout this process. A lesson to be learned — think long and hard before entering a 50/50 partnership!

Service Profile:

Forensic Accounting Services for Commercial Litigation

Arxis Financial's "Forensic Accounting Services for Commercial Litigation" include reconstruction of accounting records, analysis of business transactions, document review and tracing, and expert witness testimony. We apply detailed investigation and analysis that is necessary to uncover essential facts and provide meaningful insights.

Arxis Financial professionals provide valued assistance in a wide array of commercial litigation matters, including: bad faith, breach of contract, business interruption, fraud, partnership and shareholder disputes, trade secret and unfair competition, wrongful termination, commercial collection, debtor/creditor litigation, mergers and acquisitions, corporation/partnership dissolution, lender liability, product liability, trade libel, and Uniform Commercial Code disputes.

Our experts have extensive experience in presenting and defending our findings in litigation proceedings, including depositions and trial at local, state and federal court levels, as well as mediation and arbitration. We assist attorneys in interpreting the data, and help counsel to understand and analyze events or issues. This level of support can be a key asset in determining a legal strategy as well as reaching a reasonable and efficient conclusion.

If you have any questions about Forensic Accounting Services for Commercial Litigation, please feel free to contact us.


Upcoming Speaking Engagements for Chris Hamilton

Chris Hamilton's recent presentations include:


  • "Valuation Fundamentals, Techniques, and Theories," presented to NACVA (2-day webinar)

If you are interested in asking Mr. Hamilton to speak at your organization's upcoming meeting, please feel free to contact him.

Arxis Financial respects your time and privacy. If you no longer want to receive e-mails such as this one, please click here.
Note: Please do not respond to this E-Mail. The reply to E-Mail address is not a monitored account.

Chris Hamilton, CPA, CFE, CVA
Chris Hamilton, CPA, CFE, CVA
(805) 342-0749
Twitter Linkedin
ARXIS Financial Unsubscribe
Copyright Arxis Financial.
All rights reserved.
Clients know us for results. Opposing counsel know Arxis for wishing they had hired us.